| 01 April 2016

Pinsent Masons has been named International Law Firm of the Year for the second time at the renowned Trophées du Droit awards in Paris.

The 2016 law awards honour the best in legal services and comprise of a judging panel of some of the most influential in house lawyers and General Counsel in France.

In addition, the firm’s IP team was also awarded a silver trophy for ‘Best Specialised Teams: Patents’.

Since it’s opening in 2012, the Paris office has doubled in size, making a number of significant hires in recent years including Stéphane Gasne from East African Development Bank, Franck Lagorce from Winston & Strawn as well as Peter Rosher, Frederic Gillion and Eugénie Berthet from Clifford Chance, Fenwick Elliott and Mazars respectively.

Christoph Maurer, head of Pinsent Masons’ Paris office said: “This is an excellent achievement which reflects the strides being made by the firm in becoming an international market leader. Our strategic investment in talent across our core sectors is what enables us to achievement our commitment to excellence and I would like to extend my congratulations to the team.”

Press Release

Author(s)

Finance, Projects, energy and natural resources | 01 April 2016

International law firm Pinsent Masons has been shortlisted in the 2016 Legal Business Awards for three categories, ‘Law Firm of the Year’, ‘Energy & Infrastructure Team’ and ‘Finance Team of the Year’.

Shortlisted for Law Firm of the Year, Pinsent Masons has been recognised by the judges as a firm that has demonstrated outstanding achievements in innovation, financial performance, international expansion and client satisfaction.

In addition, Pinsent Masons is shortlisted for Energy & Infrastructure Team of the Year for advising the Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust on the procurement and negotiation of the first ever healthcare PF2 project.

Pinsent Masons’ Finance team has also been shortlisted for its innovative approach to client service for US fund, Lone Star.

The Legal Business Award winners will be announced at the annual awards ceremony on 7th April 2016 at the Grosvenor House Hotel, London.

 

Press Release

Author(s)

Technology, Media and Telecoms | 15 March 2016

Where an agreement has an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clause, it frequently has either a simple ADR clause or ‘escalation’ clauses (sometimes called ‘tiered’ or ‘stepped’ clauses). Then, where a commercial dispute arises, the parties to such an agreement are usually required to try to negotiate a settlement to the dispute. This could involve a single step (which, for a simple ADR clause, might entail mediation) or escalating steps (typically, negotiating in good faith, then if that fails to resolve the dispute, discussions between senior members of the parties’ management teams, then, if that fails, mediation). [Continue Reading]

Dispute resolution | 01 February 2015

Most people in the commercial world, even if not lawyers, are aware of what a contract is and may even have heard of a duty of care. Many may even appreciate that a breach of either can give rise to a legal liability. Fewer, however, are familiar with the concept of the fiduciary obligation and the rights and duties which flow from it. This is perhaps surprising given that fiduciary obligations can arise in a variety of everyday commercial situations and breach can give rise to drastic remedies. These may apply notwithstanding elements which may feel unfair, with the courts taking an almost moralistic tone, in turn giving rise to results which may seem harsh. Recent court decisions have highlighted the benefit of appreciating the importance of this slightly unusual area.
 [Continue Reading]

Dispute resolution | 01 December 2014

‘Jurisdiction’ is the power of a court to entertain an action or other proceeding. When parties enter into a transaction they usually include a ‘jurisdiction clause’ alongside a ‘governing law clause’ to determine where and subject to which country’s laws, any future issues should be determined. [Continue Reading]

Corporate and commercial | 01 November 2014

Terminating a commercial contract can be fraught with pitfalls and too often a decision is taken to terminate without a full appreciation of the legal and financial consequences. The High Court underlined those risks in the recent case ofComau UK Ltd v Lotus Lightweight Structures Ltd [2014], and took the opportunity to lay down guidance on the interplay between so-called ‘termination for fault’ provisions and ‘termination for convenience’ provisions, in the context of a damages claim for repudiatory breach. 
 [Continue Reading]