This country-specific Q&A provides an overview to technology laws and regulations relevant in Sweden.
It will cover communications networks and their operators, databases and software, data protection, AI, cybersecurity as well as the author’s view on planned future reforms of the technology market.
This Q&A is part of the global guide to Technology. For a full list of jurisdictional Q&As visit http://www.inhouselawyer.co.uk/index.php/practice-areas/technology
Are communications networks or services regulated? If so what activities are covered and what licences or authorisations are required?
Communication networks and services are mainly regulated in the Electronic Communications Act (Sw. Lag om elektronisk kommunikation) and the GDPR. The Radio and TV Act (Sw. Radio- och tv-lag) and the Radio Equipment Act (Sw. Radioutrustningslag) also contain relevant legislation.
The Electronic Communications Act applies to electronic communication networks and services and their corresponding installations, services and other radio usage. The transmitted content itself does not fall within the scope of the act. According to the act, public communication networks that are normally provided in exchange for money, and publicly accessible communication services, may only be provided if the business has been reported to the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority (Sw. Post- och telestyrelsen).
Regarding businesses that only transfer signals via wires for the purpose of public broadcasting of programs in accordance with chapter 1, section 1, subsection 3 in the Freedom of Expression Act (Sw. Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen), no reporting to the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority has to be done. This means that public broadcasting of e.g. radio, television, content from some databases and other transmissions via electromagnetic waves are unregulated in this aspect.
Is there any specific regulator for the provisions of communications-related services? Are they independent of the government control?
The Swedish Post and Telecom Authority and the Swedish Data Protection Authority (Sw. Datainspektionen) are the main regulators of communication-related services.
The Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation (Sw. Näringsdepartementet) is responsible for the Post and Telecom Authority and the Ministry of Justice (Sw. Justitiedepartementet) is responsible for the Data Protection Authority.
Does an operator need to be domiciled in the country? Are there any restrictions on foreign ownership of telecoms operators?
There is no need to be domiciled in the country.
There are no restrictions on foreign ownership of telecom operators.
Are there any regulations covering interconnection between operators? If so are these different for operators with market power?
In chapter 4 of the Electronic Communications Act, the matter of interconnection between operators is covered. Operators of a public communication net are obliged to negotiate about interconnection with those who provide, or intend to provide, electronic communication services to the public. Such negotiations are subject to confidentiality.
According to chapter 4, section 3 of the act, there is an obligation for operators who control the end users´ access to interconnect, or take measures that enables the end users to connect with each other. As for operators with significant market power, they can be obliged to e.g. adopt non-discriminating terms and fulfil certain demands relating to the access and use of the net in question.
What are the principal consumer protection regulations that apply specifically to telecoms services?
In chapter 5 of the Electronic Communications Act, the rights of consumers purchasing electronic communication services can be found. There are also provisions explaining the duties of the operators.
Operators that offer their services to consumers must have their prices and general terms accessible for the consumers. It is sufficient to have them uploaded to the website of the company. Furthermore, the agreement between the consumer and the operator must contain clear and easily accessible details about e.g. the lowest level of quality offered, the measures taken to measure and control the traffic with the purpose of avoiding overloads of the net and how the measures can affect the quality of the services, and delivery time. An agreement between a consumer and an operator may not have a longer curing period than 24 months.
After the curing period, an operator that has provided services in combination with terminal devices must, at the request of the consumer, remove operating locks without charge or delay.
What legal protections are offered in relation to the creators of computer software?
Computer software and their creators are protected through several acts, the most relevant being the Patent Act (Sw. Patentlagen), the Act on the Right to Employee´s Inventions (Sw. Lag om rätten till arbetstagaresuppfinningar), the Circuit Pattern Protection Act (Sw. Lag om skydd för kretsmönster för halvledarprodukter), the Industrial Secrets Protection Act (Sw. Lag om skydd för företagshemligheter), and the Copyright Act (Sw. Lag om upphovsrätt till litterära och konstnärliga verk).
Program codes per se are not eligible for patent registration in Sweden. A technical invention that is executed by software can however be patentable, thus resulting in an indirect protection of the software.
Software will obtain copyright protection if it is original in the sense that it is an intellectual creation of the creator.
Do you recognise specific intellectual property rights in respect of data/databases?
There is no specific recognition of intellectual property rights in respect of data/databases. It is nonetheless possible for databases to acquire copyright protection under section 49 of the Copyright Act, which was implements Directive 96/9/EC. The article stipulates that a person who has created a catalogue, chart or similar, in which a great number of data have been compiled, or which is the result of a big investment, has the exclusive right to produce copies of the work and make it accessible for the public. The aforementioned right is valid until fifteen years after the year of creation of the work have passed. If the work has been made accessible for the public within fifteen years, the right becomes valid until fifteen years from the publication have passed.
What key protections exist for personal data?
The key protections are mainly laid out in the GDPR, together with some supplementary Swedish legislation. In summary, the following can be said about the protection.
Personal data shall be:
(a) processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject (‘lawfulness, fairness and transparency’);
(b) collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes; further processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes shall, in accordance with Article 89(1) of the GDPR, not be considered to be incompatible with the initial purposes (‘purpose limitation’);
(c) adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed (‘data minimisation’);
(d) accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date; every reasonable step must be taken to ensure that personal data that are inaccurate, having regard to the purposes for which they are processed, are erased or rectified without delay (‘accuracy’);
(e) kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the personal data are processed; personal data may be stored for longer periods insofar as the personal data will be processed solely for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes in accordance with Article 89(1) of the GDPR subject to implementation of the appropriate technical and organisational measures required by the GDPR in order to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the data subject (‘storage limitation’);
(f) processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data, including protection against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against accidental loss, destruction or damage, using appropriate technical or organisational measures (‘integrity and confidentiality’).
Furthermore, data controllers are obliged to be able to demonstrate that, and how, they fulfil the obligations of the GDPR (accountability).
All processing of personal data has to rest on at least one of the six legal grounds set out in the GDPR. The six legal grounds are the following:
- Processing of personal data that emanates from consent from the data subject. The consent can cover one or several specific purposes.
- Processing of personal data that is necessary to fulfil a contract to which the data subject is a party or in order to take steps at the request of the data subject prior to entering into a contract.
- Processing of personal data that is necessary to fulfil a legal obligation.
- Processing of personal data that is necessary to protect vital interests of the data subject or other natural persons.
- Processing of personal data that is necessary to carry out a task that is of public interest, or in line with the exercise of official authority of the data controller.
- Processing of personal data that is necessary for purposes of legitimate interests pursued by the data controller or a third party. This does not apply when interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject require protection of the personal data, especially when the data subject is a child. The exclusion cannot be applied to processing executed by public authorities in the performance of their tasks.
It must be clear for the data subjects how their personal data are processed. Accordingly, the data subjects must be made aware of the processing of personal data per se, why the data is being processed, and how it is used. Understandable information must be provided by the data controller about the processing and in a manner which makes it easy for the data subjects to find the information. If the data subjects are children, the language needs to be even clearer. See articles 13 and 14 of the GDPR.
Rights of the data subjects
Data subjects have a number of rights listed in the GDPR. These are mainly laid out in articles 15 up to and including 21 and comprise the following rights:
- Right to information and access by the data subject;
- Right to rectification;
- Right to erasure;
- Right to restriction of processing;
- Right to notification of erasure or restriction of processing;
- Right to data portability; and
- Right to object.
The data subjects have the right to receive the personal data provided to a data controller in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format (Right to access). Upon request from the data subject, the personal data is under certain circumstances to be erased (Right to erasure). Moreover, the data subject has the right to transfer those data to another data controller without hindrance where (i) the processing is based on consent pursuant to point (a) of article 6(1) or point (a) of article 9(2) or on a contract pursuant to point (b) of article 6(1); and (ii) the processing is carried out by automated means (Right to data portability). When it is technically feasible, the data subject has the right to have personal data transmitted directly from one data controller to another.
It shall also be noted that more stringent rules apply to ‘sensitive’ personal data (e.g. personal data relating to health or trade union membership).
Are there restrictions on the transfer of personal data overseas?
There are no restrictions regarding transfer of data between states in the EEA.
The GDPR stipulates when transfers of personal data to an area outside of the EEA are allowed. In short, transfers are permitted when:
- there is a decision from the Commission stating that a third-party state ensures an adequate level of protection for personal data;
- the data controller has made suitable protection measures, such as Binding Corporate Rules or Standard Contractual Clauses;
- special situations and single cases require it, such as e.g. when the data subject has explicitly consented to the proposed transfer, after having been informed of the possible risks of such transfers for the data subject due to the absence of an adequacy decision and appropriate safeguards; the transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract between the data subject and the data controller or the implementation of pre-contractual measures taken at the data subject's request; the transfer is necessary for the conclusion or performance of a contract concluded in the interest of the data subject between the data controller and another natural or legal person; the transfer is necessary for important reasons of public interest.
What is the maximum fine that can be applied for breach of data protection laws?
According to article 83 in the GDPR, the maximum fine that can be applied for a breach is EUR 20 million, or 4 % of the company´s annual turnover of the previous financial year, whichever is higher.
Are there any restrictions applicable to cloud-based services?
Typically, a cloud service provider will qualify as a data processor according to the GDPR. In order for the processing of the data processing to be compliant with the GDPR there has to be a written contract between the data controller and the data processor. This contract is supposed to make sure that the data processor protects the personal data with all technical and organisational measures necessary to ensure the protection of the rights of the data subjects.
Are there specific requirements for the validity of an electronic signature?
The general requirements for electronic signatures are set out in the eIDAS Regulation (EU 910/2014) and the Act on Supplementary Regulations to the eIDAS Regulation (Sw. Lag med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s förordning om elektronisk identifiering). Detailed provisions regarding the requirements are however not included in the aforementioned documents. Instead, the Commission has the authority to further specify the standards required.
An electronic signature can be created in two ways.
- Either directly, with the help of an electronic certificate that connects validation data for an electronic signature to a physical person, confirming at least the name or pseudonym of the person, or
- Indirectly, in the sense that the user proves her/his identity so that a special signature certificate can be delivered by a third-party service and then used to produce the electronic signature.
In eIDAS, there are three levels of security relating to electronic signatures. These are: standard electronic signatures, advanced electronic signatures (AdES), and qualified electronic signatures (QES). Standard electronic signatures have the lowest level of trust, and can e.g. be in the shape of a scanned handwritten signature. A QES has the highest level of trust. It is the only type of signature that has the same legal value as a handwritten signature. For an electronic signature to become a QES, it requires that the signatory uses a certificate based digital ID that has been issued by a Trust Service Provider (TSP), together with a qualified signature creating device (QSCD). The QSCD can be in the shape of a smart card, a USB token or an application that creates a disposable password.
Different levels of security are needed depending on what the signatory wants to do.
In the event of an outsourcing of IT services, would any employees, assets or third party contracts transfer automatically to the outsourcing supplier?
No, not automatically. However, if an asset of a business according to section 6 b of the Swedish Employment Protection Act (Sw. Lag om anställningsskydd), e.g. an IT service, which is deemed to be an “autonomous economic entity”, is being transferred, an employee working in that department might be transferred to the outsourcing supplier, unless he or she refuses. In practice, this is not an issue, since it tends to be solved by the involved parties.
As for assets and third-party contracts, no transfer to the outsourcing supplier will occur.
If a software program which purports to be an early form of A.I. malfunctions, who is liable?
The question of A.I. malfunction liability would, for the time being, probably have to be resolved with the help of provisions concerning product liability and classical principles of liability. If this would result in a fair result remains to be seen.
What key laws exist in terms of obligations as to the maintenance of cyber security?
The GDPR contains some provisions regarding the maintenance of cybersecurity. They are however mostly concentrated on the protection of personal data.
When it comes to the protection of technical infrastructure, the newly adopted NIS directive (EU 2016/1148), which will be implemented in Swedish law via the Swedish Act on IT Protection for Socially Important and Digital Services Act (Sw. lag om informationssäkerhet för samhällsviktiga och digitala tjänster) 1 August 2018, serves as the main framework. The purpose of the directive is to achieve a high level of security in networks and information systems that belong to:
- services crucial to society within the sectors of
- infrastructure of the finance market,
- delivery and distribution of drinking water,
- digital infrastructure, and
- digital services in general.
Different rules apply for services that belong to categories 1 and 2.
- services crucial to society within the sectors of
What key laws exist in terms of the criminality of hacking/DDOS attacks?
Chapter 4, section 9 c of the Penal Code (Sw. Brottsbalken) stipulates the illegality of DDOS attacks and hacking. The punishment is a fine or imprisonment for up to two years. If the DDOS attack or hacking can be considered severe, the punishment is imprisonment for up to six years.
What technology development will create the most legal change in your jurisdiction?
It is plausible that the swift development of A.I. and self-controlling vehicles will result in the biggest legal change in the near future. However, one should not underestimate the legal and economic consequences that could occur if crypto currencies and blockchain technologies are allowed to further develop.
Which current legal provision/regime creates the greatest impediment to economic development/commerce?
As a member state of the EU, Sweden implements and applies all EU legislation. National Swedish laws, not emanating from the EU, do not create any major impediments to economic development.
Some legislation regarding taxation, employment protection and permits for the construction of buildings could be seen as hindering. Long processing times with the authorities is also an impediment to economic development that is difficult to contradict.
Do you believe your legal system specifically encourages or hinders digital services?
Digital services are ruled in essence by EU legislation. The provisions set out in Swedish legislation are often of a general character, with supplementary information in the preparatory works. Sweden strives for being in the forefront when it comes to digital services and the legislation is not hindering this development.
The Swedish tech-market has been seen continuous and rapid development for a long time. In 2017 Forbes ranked Sweden as the best country in the world for business. The technology friendly system has enabled many Swedish tech-companies to flourish. In addition to this, Sweden is widely considered to be one of the leading countries in Europe when it comes to technology start-ups.
As for legislative measures that encourages digital services and development, it should be mentioned that it is possible to apply for generous tax deductions for employees working with R&D.
To what extent is your legal system ready to deal with the legal issues associated with artificial intelligence?
The Swedish legal system is not yet completely ready to deal specifically with legal issues associated with A.I. Since Sweden is far from alone in the EU in this regard, it is not unlikely that this will be resolved within the EU.